1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia 1959 Jeep CJ5
Make Alfa Romeo Jeep
Model Giulia CJ5
Year Released 1962 1959
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1568 cc 3153 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 62 HP
Torque 145 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 1350 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2060 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]