1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 40 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Giulia | Puma |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 42 L |