1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 80 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia (145 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
| Model | Giulia | Smart |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 47 L |
