1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2004 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 447 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2004 Daewoo Evanda | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
| Model | Giulia | Evanda |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 131 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1497 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 65 L |
