1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (205 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 307 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (271 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1357 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 49 L |