1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 333 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Giulia | 3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 60 L |