1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 706 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Giulia | CTS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 68 L |