1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (316 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 316 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 98 L |