1962 Alpine A 108 vs. 1980 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1980 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 108 would be higher. At 956 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alpine A 108 (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alpine A 108 should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 425 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Alpine A 108. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Daihatsu Taft (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alpine A 108. (58 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1980 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 108 | 1980 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Alpine | Daihatsu |
Model | A 108 | Taft |
Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2030 mm |