1962 Alpine A 108 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 108 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 108. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 108. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 491 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 108. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Alpine A 108 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alpine A 108. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alpine A 108 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | Alpine | Buick |
| Model | A 108 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1086 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2580 mm |
