1962 Alpine A 108 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 108 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 108. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 108. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 108. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alpine A 108. (58 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 108 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 108 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 78 L |