1962 Alpine A 108 vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 108 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 895 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C (250 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alpine A 108. (58 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 108 | 2008 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Alpine | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 108 | C |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 66 L |