1962 Alpine A 108 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 108. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 108 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 108. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Because 1962 Alpine A 108 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alpine A 108. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alpine A 108. (58 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alpine A 108.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alpine A 108 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Alpine | Holden |
| Model | A 108 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2685 mm |
