1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alpine A 110 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Alpine | Triumph |
| Model | A 110 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |
