1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1972 ZAZ 966 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 956 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alpine A 110 (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1972 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1972 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Alpine | ZAZ |
Model | A 110 | 966 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2170 mm |