1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2006 BMW 323
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alpine A 110 | 2006 BMW 323 | |
| Make | Alpine | BMW |
| Model | A 110 | 323 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 2497 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 63 L |
