1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2287 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 21.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2862 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |