1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 98 L |