1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Honda FR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda FR-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda FR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda FR-V (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda FR-V should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Because 1962 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda FR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Honda FR-V | |
Make | Alpine | Honda |
Model | A 110 | FR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 58 L |