1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Kia Borrego
To start off, 2010 Kia Borrego is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Borrego is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Borrego (272 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Borrego should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110.
Because 2010 Kia Borrego is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Borrego will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Borrego has automatic transmission and 1962 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1962 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Borrego will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Kia Borrego | |
| Make | Alpine | Kia |
| Model | A 110 | Borrego |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 3777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 272 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
