1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 507 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Alpine A 110 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Alpine Cadillac
Model A 110 CTS-V
Year Released 1962 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 956 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 556 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 575 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1140 mm 1455 mm
Wheelbase Size 2140 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 68 L