1962 Alpine A 110 vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (185 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1580 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alpine A 110 | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A 110 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |