1962 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 (204 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 20 kg more than 1962 Aston Martin DB4.
Because 1962 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 (324 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1962 Aston Martin DB4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DB4 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Aston Martin | Lancia |
Model | DB4 | Nea |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2590 mm |