1962 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 (238 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Because 1962 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Aston Martin DB4 (320 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1962 Aston Martin DB4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DB4 | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DB4 | Fusion |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1840 mm |