1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1960 Austin A 40
To start off, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1960 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DBR2 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 26 L |