1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | DBR2 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1973 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 65 L |