1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1998 Honda CR-V is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1998 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Aston Martin | Honda |
Model | DBR2 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |