1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | DBR2 | Clio |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 50 L |