1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Aston Martin | Jeep |
Model | DBR2 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 87 L |