1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2001 MG ZT
To start off, 2001 MG ZT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2001 MG ZT. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2001 MG ZT.
Because 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2001 MG ZT | |
| Make | Aston Martin | MG |
| Model | DBR2 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 65 L |
