1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Suburban. (282 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Suburban.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2003 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chevrolet |
Model | DBR2 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 117 L |