1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Nissan |
| Model | DBR2 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 60 L |
