1962 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2013 Subaru Outback is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2013 Subaru Outback. (171 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2013 Subaru Outback.
Because 2013 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Aston Martin | Subaru |
Model | DBR2 | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2740 mm |