1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1950 DKW F 89
To start off, 1962 Austin A 40 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 40 (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 DKW F 89 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1950 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2360 mm |
