1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1960 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1962 Austin A 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1382 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1960 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2050 mm |
