1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1963 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1963 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 210 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (116 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Lancia Fulvia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1963 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | A 40 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |