1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | A 40 | Elan |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |