1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1964 Pontiac Tempest is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 590 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1964 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Austin | Pontiac |
| Model | A 40 | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2930 mm |
