1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1970 Chevrolet C-10
To start off, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | C-10 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
