1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 40 | 280 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2410 mm |