1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey
To start off, 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey (120 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey weights approximately 400 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1975 Jensen Jensen-Healey | |
| Make | Austin | Jensen |
| Model | A 40 | Jensen-Healey |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
