1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 1977 Mazda 616 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mazda 616 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 40 | 616 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2480 mm |
