1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1981 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3090 mm |