1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 785 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2750 mm |
