1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1982 Pontiac Firebird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (168 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | A 40 | Firebird |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |