1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1983 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1983 Fiat Argenta is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,445 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Argenta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Argenta (88 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Argenta (200 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Argenta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1983 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 40 | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2445 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2570 mm |
