1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4690 mm |