1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Cadillac Cimarron

To start off, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 390 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (297 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1985 Cadillac Cimarron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: