1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Nissan AZ-1
To start off, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,950 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (195 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (277 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1985 Nissan AZ-1 | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | AZ-1 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2440 mm |
