1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1986 Citroen Aventure
To start off, 1986 Citroen Aventure is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen Aventure is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Citroen Aventure (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen Aventure (120 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1986 Citroen Aventure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1986 Citroen Aventure | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | A 40 | Aventure |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
